Area Abbonati
DOI 10.1723/3351.33223 Scarica il PDF (490,5 kb)
Ital J Gender-Specific Med 2020;6(2):68-73

Prothrombotic risk factors in pregnancy

Luca Spiezia, Elena Campello, Chiara Simion, Paolo Simioni

Department of Medicine DIMED, Thrombotic and Haemorrhagic and Coagulation Diseases Unit, Veneto Region Hemophilia and Thrombophilia Center, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy





Summary. Pregnancy and puerperium have historically been associated with a significant increase – five- and tenfold vs non-pregnant women, respectively – of the thromboembolic risk, which in turn is the main cause of maternal mortality. Predisposing factors for thrombosis include components of the so-called Virchow’s triad: venous stasis, hypercoagulability and endothelial damage/dysfunction. Venous stasis is secondary to the compression that the uterus exerts on the inferior vena cava and the pelvic veins, to the reduction of the progesterone-mediated venous tone and to the development of varicose veins in the lower limbs; and, sometimes, to a prolonged immobilization. Furthermore, there is a physiological tendency to hypercoagulability, caused by an imbalance between procoagulant and anticoagulant factors, which on the one hand counters the postpartum hemorrhagic risk, while on the other increases the thromboembolic risk. The hypercoagulable profile may be confirmed via global coagulation assessment tests, such as thrombin generation and thromboelastometry/-graphy. The presence of a thrombophilic state – the tendency to develop thrombosis from an inherited or acquired condition – may contribute, alone or in association with other compounding factors, to the added thrombotic risk described in pregnancy. Pregnancy, especially if complicated, also involves endothelial activation, which may trigger thrombotic events, as confirmed by the increased levels of various plasma markers. Finally, the Virchow’s triad is often exacerbated by several thrombotic risk factors, such as a personal history of venous thrombosis, advanced age, obesity, plurality, smoking, hypertension, blood group A and caesarean section.

Key words. Pregnancy, prothrombotic risk factors, maternal mortality.


Fattori di rischio protrombotici in gravidanza

Riassunto. Gravidanza e puerperio sono storicamente associati a un significativo aumento, rispettivamente di 5 e 10 volte rispetto alla donna non gravida, del rischio tromboembolico, a sua volta principale causa di mortalità materna. Fattori predisponenti per trombosi sono gli elementi ascrivibili alla cosiddetta triade di Virchow, ovvero stasi venosa, ipercoagulabilità e danno/disfunzione endoteliale. La stasi venosa è secondaria alla compressione dell’utero sulle vene cava inferiore e pelviche, alla riduzione del tono venoso progesterone-mediata, allo sviluppo di varici agli arti inferiori e, talora, ad una prolungata immobilizzazione. Per di più, si crea una fisiologica tendenza all’ipercoagulabilità, meccanismo volto a contrastare il rischio emorragico nel post-partum, e risultante da uno squilibrio tra fattori procoagulanti (aumentati) ed anticoagulanti e fibrinolitici (ridotti). Il profilo ipercoagulabile è avvalorato dai risultati di test di valutazione globale della coagulazione come la generazione di trombina e la tromboelastometria/grafia. La presenza di un’eventuale trombofilia, ovvero una tendenza a sviluppare trombosi sulla base di un disordine ereditario o acquisito dell’emostasi, concorre, da sola o in associazione, e in misura variabile a seconda del tipo di alterazione, all’aumento del rischio trombotico anche in gravidanza. La gravidanza, soprattutto se complicata, comporta inoltre un’attivazione endoteliale, che può contribuire alla genesi di eventi trombotici, come confermato dall’aumento di alcuni marcatori plasmatici. Infine, a tali condizioni si accompagnano spesso diversi fattori di rischio trombotico, come storia personale di trombosi venosa, età avanzata, obesità, pluriparità, fumo, ipertensione, gruppo sanguigno A e taglio cesareo.

Parole chiave. Gravidanza, fattori di rischio protrombotici, mortalità materna.




Pregnancy significantly increases the risk of a thromboembolic event in women.1,2 Studies published in the literature so far report that, for a pregnant woman, the risk of developing a thromboembolic event is about fivefold that of a non-pregnant woman – with a further increase up to tenfold during the puerperium.3,4 Notably, venous thromboembolic disease is recognized as one of the main causes of mortality during pregnancy and puerperium.2,5 There is a wide consensus that the increased thrombotic risk during pregnancy strongly correlates with the presence of predisposing conditions, such as: 1) venous stasis; 2) hypercoagulability; 3) endothelial damage/dysfunction – all of which are components of the so-called Virchow’s triad (Table 1). In addition, several other risk factors – such as age, obesity, smoking, previous thromboembolic episodes and fertility treatments – may also contribute to the increased thrombotic risk observed in pregnancy.

Venous stasis

From a mechanical perspective, the increase in intraabdominal pressure caused by the growing fetus results in an abnormal compression of the endoabdominal vessels – mainly the inferior vena cava and the pelvic veins – with a subsequent blood stagnation in the lower limbs, which might favor the development of thrombosis.6-8 Moreover, the decreased venous tone secondary to the higher plasma levels of progesterone in pregnant women may predispose to venous stasis. The pressure that the uterus applies on the vena cava may also further contribute to the development of varicose veins in the legs, one of the main known risk factors for superficial venous thrombosis.9 Finally, some pregnant women may require prolonged immobilization, especially in the final stages, which may further increase the incidence of thrombotic events.10 Graduated elastic compression stockings could be considered the main useful tool to prevent and alleviate venous stasis, though their effectiveness in actually reducing the risk of thrombosis has not been definitively proved yet.11,12


The plasma concentrations of several coagulation factors change during pregnancy, to achieve a hypercoagulable state.13-16 While this acts as a natural adaptive mechanism to prevent postpartum bleeding, it however exposes women to an increased thrombotic risk. Several procoagulant proteins, such as factors VII, VIII, X, fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor, increase during pregnancy.13 Concomitantly, the plasma levels of coagulation inhibitors such as protein S drop noticeably from the early stages of pregnancy.17 Moreover, there are reports of a reduced activity of the fibrinolytic system, mainly due to an increase of the type 2 placenta-derived plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-2).18 Global assays for blood clotting evaluation, such as thrombin generation (TG) and thromboelastometry/-graphy (TEM/TEG), have been able to accurately confirm the peculiar hypercoagulable state described in pregnant women. In particular, several papers published in literature have reported a significant increase in endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) – one of the main TG parameters – both in healthy and pathological pregnancies.17,19-21 Also, viscoelastic tests conducted on whole blood were able to identify – in pregnant women vs non-pregnant women – a hypercoagulable profile, mainly characterized by a faster activation of the coagulation cascade and a stronger clot firmness.22,23 It is still up for debate whether abnormal results from traditional laboratory tests and/or global assays can reliably identify pregnant women most at risk of developing thrombotic events. Hence the inability to determine which patients should receive thromboprophylaxis.


The term “thrombophilia” refers to the presence in the blood of a congenital or acquired predisposition to thrombosis. The most known congenital thrombophilic conditions are the FV Leiden mutation, the prothrombin variant and the reduction of natural coagulation inhibitors (eg. protein C, protein S and antithrombin).24 The most common acquired thrombophilic condition is the antibody antiphospholipid syndrome.25 Clores et al recently conducted a systematic review of several studies on the risk of pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) in women with thrombophilia.26 There have been reports that women with a heterozygous FV Leiden mutation carry a 4- to 16-fold increased risk of thromboembolic disease during pregnancy, which may further increase up to 40-fold in women with FV Leiden homozygosity. Depending on the prothrombin variant, the risk of thromboembolic disease may increase 3- to 15-fold. With regard to antithrombin, protein C and protein S deficiencies, most of the data on the risk of thromboembolic disease in pregnancy derive from small family studies, precisely due to the rarity of these thrombophilic abnormalities. The risk of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy seems particularly high in women with antithrombin deficiency, with an annual incidence estimated at 30-40%, but is considerably lower in women with protein S or protein C deficiencies, with an annual incidence estimated at 6-13%. Finally, the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome is a systemic autoimmune disorder characterised by venous or arterial thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity (eg. one or more unexplained deaths of a morphologically normal fetus; one or more premature births or three or more consecutive spontaneous pregnancy losses), in the presence of persistent laboratory evidence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL).27 Antiphospholipid antibodies are a heterogeneous group of autoantibodies directed against negatively charged molecules and towards a combination of phospholipids and plasma proteins. They are divided into three classes: anticardiolipin (aCL), antibeta2glycoprotein1 (anti β 2GPI) and lupus anticoagulant (LAC). Their antibody action is directed against various combinations of phospholipids, proteins with a high affinity for phospholipids or phospholipid-protein complexes. According to the literature, the presence of aPL has been confirmed in approximately 10% of pregnant women with deep vein thrombosis.28,29

An aspect that is always much debated is which pregnant woman may benefit most from thrombophilia screening. Furthermore, considering the aforementioned changes in the coagulation factors, it would be advisable, when possible, to conduct the thrombophilia study before pregnancy. Based on a consensus paper published by the Italian Society for Hemostasis and Thrombosis (SISET) in 2009, Table 2 presents a summary of the women who should or should not receive a thrombophilic screening.30 Another highly debated issue is the optimal pharmacological prophylaxis for asymptomatic (i.e. with no prior VTE and/or obstetric complications) pregnant women with hereditary thrombophilia. Following SISET recommendations, women with a major thrombophilic defect (eg. deficiency of protein C or protein S, double heterozygous carriers of FV Leiden and prothrombin variant or homozygous carriers of FV Leiden or prothrombin variant) should receive prophylactic doses of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) antepartum and for 6 weeks after delivery.30 Women with antithrombin deficiency should receive moderate doses of LMWH antepartum and for 6 weeks after delivery, and the use of antithrombin concentrates at the time of delivery should be considered.30 Finally, heterozygous carriers of FV Leiden of prothrombin variant should receive postpartum prophylactic doses of LMWH for 6 weeks after delivery.30

Endothelial damage/dysfunction

It has been widely reported in the literature that endothelial cell activation may contribute to hypercoagulability, both during physiological, but also – and especially – during pathological pregnancies (eg. gestational diabetes, preeclampsia and hypertension, obesity and hyperlipidemia).31 In fact, the peculiar structure of the placenta, with its dual endothelial layers (i.e. on the maternal and fetal sides), makes this organ particularly susceptible not only to an alteration of the endothelial function, but also to the activation of the coagulation cascade. The tissue factor (TF)-driven procoagulant role of the trophoblast, phosphatidylserine and fibrin deposition renders the placenta prone to thrombotic risk.32 Several parameters have been proposed as markers of endothelial dysfunction in pregnant women [eg. tissue-type plasminogen activator antigen (t-PA), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), von Willebrand factor antigen, exosomes and microparticles, matrix metalloproteinases (MMP), vascular and intracellular cell adhesion molecules (VCAM and ICAM), reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS and RNS), microRNAs, etc.].33-36 The main limitation pertaining to the diagnosis of this predisposing factor is the difficulty to carry out laboratory tests that can detect endothelial damage/dysfunction.

Other prothrombotic risk factors

Several clinical studies have identified numerous conditions associated with an increased thrombotic risk in pregnancy, in addition to the aforementioned mechanisms attributable to the Virchow’s triad. However, it should be noted that the current literature only allows to establish a nexus between the phenomena (risk factor vs thrombotic event), rather than to identify an etiological connection.

A previous thromboembolic event has been reported as the most important risk factor for antenatal recurrence of venous thrombosis.37,38 This risk increases if the maternal age is >356 or in case of additional independent risk factors, such as obesity,39 multiple pregnancies,39-43 or smoking.39,40,44 Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have also been identified as a possible risk factor for venous thromboembolism.45,46 Notably, the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a syndrome characterized by supraphysiological estradiol levels, which induce a sustained activation of the coagulation cascade, resulting in thrombotic events that have been reported to occur weeks after OHSS had resolved.46,47 During the postnatal period, increasing age,6,40,48 hypertension (probably due to preeclampsia)40,48 and blood group A41,49 appear to be the most important risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Another salient risk factor for thromboembolic disease in puerperium is the caesarean section, which precedes more than 75% of the deaths from puerperium pulmonary embolism.50,51


A state of hypercoagulability is a physiological necessity during pregnancy which, compounded by other prothrombotic conditions (eg. immobilization, obesity, smoking, hypertension, etc.), may considerably increase the risk of developing thrombotic events. Although many efforts have been made to clarify the risk of thrombosis in pregnancy, a clear understanding of the underlying mechanisms remains elusive. There are currently no laboratory tests to ascertain the risk of developing thrombosis. Hence, the challenge in identifying women who may require pharmacological antithrombotic prophylaxis due to their high risk of developing thrombosis. Larger prospective studies are warranted to broaden our understanding of the mechanisms which favor the development of thromboembolic events during pregnancy, in order to optimize treatment and reduce the incidence of these potentially fatal complications.


1. Heit JA, Kobbervig CE, James AH, Petterson TM, Bailey KR, Melton LJ 3rd. Trends in the incidence of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or postpartum: a 30-year population-based study. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(10):697-706.

2. James AH, Jamison MG, Brancazio LR, Myers ER. Venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the postpartum period: incidence, risk factors, and mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(5):1311-5.

3. Parunov LA, Soshitova NP, Ovanesov MV, Panteleev MA, Serebriyskiy II. Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism (VTE) associated with pregnancy. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2015;105(3):167-84.

4. Kourlaba G, Relakis J, Kontodimas S, Holm MV, Maniadakis N. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the epidemiology and burden of venous thromboembolism among pregnant women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;132(1):4-10.

5. Chang J, Elam-Evans LD, Berg CJ, Herndon J, Flowers L, Seed KA, et al. Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance: United States, 1991-1999. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2003;

6. Macklon NS, Greer IA, Bowman AW. An ultrasound study of gestational and postural changes in the deep venous system of the leg in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104(2):1917.

7. Danilenko-Dixon DR, Heit JA, Silverstein MD, Yawn BP, Petterson TM, Lohse CM, et al. Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism during pregnancy or post-partum: a population-based, case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(2):10410.

8. Gordon MC. Maternal physiology. In: Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR and Simpson JL, editors. Obstetrics: normal and problem pregnancies. 5th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Churchill Livingstone; 2007. p. 5584.

9. Piazza G. Varicose veins. Circulation. 2014;130(7):582-7.

10. Jacobsen AF, Skjeldestad FE, Sandset PM. Ante- and postnatal risk factors of venous thrombosis: a hospital-based case-control study. J Thromb Haemost. 2008;6(6):905-12.

11. Ra ţ iu A, Motoc A, P ă scu ţ D, Cri ş an DC, Anca T, P ă scu ţ M. Compression and walking compared with bed rest in the treatment of proximal deep venous thrombosis during pregnancy. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2009;113(3):795-8.

12. Bagaria SJ, Bagaria VB. Strategies for diagnosis and prevention of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy. J Pregnancy. 2011;2011:206858.

13. Brenner B. Haemostatic changes in pregnancy. Thromb Res. 2004;114(5-6):409-14.

14. Uchikova EH, Ledjev II. Changes in haemostasis during normal pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005,119(2);185-8.

15. Franchini M. Haemostasis and pregnancy. Thromb Haemost. 2006;95(3):401–13

16. Szecsi PB, Jørgensen M, Klajnbard A, Andersen MR, Colov NP, Stender S. Haemostatic reference intervals in pregnancy. Thromb Haemost. 2010;103(4):718-27.

17. Kovac MK , Lalic-Cosic SZ , Dmitrovic JM , Djordjevic VJ, Radojkovic DP. Thrombin generation, D-dimer and protein S in uncomplicated pregnancy. Clin Chem Lab Med . 2015;53(12):1975-9.

18. Bremme K, Ostlund E, Almqvist I, Heinonen K, Blombäck M. Enhanced thrombin generation and fibrinolytic activity in normal pregnancy and the puerperium. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80(1):132-7.

19. Rosenkranz A , Hiden M , Leschnik B , Weiss EC, Schlembach D, Lang U, et al. Calibrated automated thrombin generation in normal uncomplicated pregnancy. Thromb Haemost . 2008;99(2):331-7.

20. Bagot CN, Leishman E, Onyiaodike CC, Jordan F, Freeman DJ. Normal pregnancy is associated with an increase in thrombin generation from the very early stages of the first trimester. Thromb Res. 2017;157:49-54.

21. Macey MG, Bevan S, Alam S, Verghese L, Agrawal S, Beski S, et al. Platelet activation and endogenous thrombin potential in pre-eclampsia. Thromb Res. 2010;125(3):e76-81.

22. Huissoud C, Carrabin N, Benchaib M, Fontaine O, Levrat A, Massignon D, et al. Coagulation assessment by rotation thrombelastometry in normal pregnancy. Thromb Haemost. 2009;101(4):755-61.

23. Armstrong S, Fernando R, Ashpole K, Simons R, Columb M. Assessment of coagulation in the obstetric population using ROTEM® thromboelastometry. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011;20(4):293-8.

24. Campello E, Spiezia L, Adamo A, Simioni P. Thrombophilia, risk factors and prevention. Expert Rev Hematol. 2019;12(3):147-58.

25. Kemp M, Thomas W. Antiphospholipid syndrome in obstetrics. Lupus. 2018;27(1-suppl):28-31.

26. Croles FN, Nasserinejad K, Duvekot JJ, Kruip MJ, Meijer K, Leebeek FW. Pregnancy, thrombophilia, and the risk of a first venous thrombosis: systematic review and bayesian meta-analysis. BMJ. 2017;359:j4452.

27. Negrini S, Pappalardo F, Murdaca G, Indiveri F, Puppo F. The antiphospholipid syndrome: from pathophysiology to treatment. Clin Exp Med. 2017;17(3):257-67.

28. Andreoli L, Chighizola CB, Banzato A, Pons-Estel GJ, Ramire de Jesus G, Erkan D. Estimated frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with pregnancy morbidity, stroke, myocardial infarction, and deep vein thrombosis: a critical review of the literature. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013;65(11):1869-73.

29. Chighizola CB, Andreoli L, de Jesus GR, Banzato A, Pons-Estel GJ, Erkan D; APS ACTION. The association between antiphospholipid antibodies and pregnancy morbidity, stroke, myocardial infarction, and deep vein thrombosis: a critical review of the literature. Lupus. 2015;24(9):980-4.

30. Lussana F, Dentali F, Abbate R, d’Aloja E, D’Angelo A, De Stefano V, et al. Italian Society for Haemostasis and Thrombosis. Screening for thrombophilia and antithrombotic prophylaxis in pregnancy: guidelines of the Italian Society for Haemostasis and Thrombosis (SISET). Thromb Res. 2009;124(5):19-25.

31. Noori M, Donald AE, Angelakopoulou A, Hingorani AD, Williams DJ. Prospective study of placental angiogenic factors and maternal vascular function before and after preeclampsia and gestational hypertension. Circulation. 2010;122(5):478-87.

32. Prochazkova J, Slavik L, Ulehlova J, Prochazka M. The role of tissue factor in normal pregnancy and in the development of preeclampsia: a review. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2015;159(2):192-6.

33. Slavik L , Prochazkova J , Prochazka M , et al. The pathophysiology of endothelial function in pregnancy and the usefulness of endothelial markers. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub . 2011;155(4):333-7.

34. Radu CM, Campello E, Spiezia L, Dhima S, Visentin S, et al. Origin and levels of circulating microparticles in normal pregnancy: a longitudinal observation in healthy women. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2015;75(6):487-95.

35. Campello E, Spiezia L, Radu CM, Dhima S, Visentin S, et al. Circulating microparticles in umbilical cord blood in normal pregnancy and pregnancy with preeclampsia. Thromb Res. 2015;136(2):427-31.

36. Echeverria C, Eltit F, Santibanez JF, Gatica S, Cabello-Verrugio C, Simon F. Endothelial dysfunction in pregnancy metabolic disorders. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2019;pii:S0925-4439(19)30061-4.

37. De Stefano V, Martinelli I, Rossi E, Battaglioli T, Za T, Mannuccio Mannucci P, et al. The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and puerperium without antithrombotic prophylaxis. Br J Haematol. 2006;135(3):386-91.

38. Galambosi PJ, Ulander VM, Kaaja RJ. The incidence and risk factors of recurrent venous thromboembolism during pregnancy. Thromb Res. 2014;134(2):240-5.

39. Larsen TB, Sorensen HT, Gislum M, Johnsen SP. Maternal smoking, obesity, and risk of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the puerperium: a population-based nested case-control study. Thromb Res. 2007;120(4):505-9.

40. Lindqvist P, Dahlback B, Marsal K. Thrombotic risk during pregnancy: a population study. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;

41. Simpson EL, Lawrenson RA, Nightingale AL, Farmer RD. Venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and the puerperium: incidence and additional risk factors from a London perinatal database. BJOG. 2001;108(1):56-60.

42. James AH, Tapson VF, Goldberg SZ. Thrombosis during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(1):216-9.

43. Jacobsen AF, Skjeldestad FE, Sandest PM. Incidence and risk patterns of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and puerperium- a register-based case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(2):233.e1-7.

44. Calhoun B, Hoover E, Seybold D, Broce M, Hill A, Schaible B, et al. Outcomes in an obstetrical population with hereditary thrombophilia and high tobacco use. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(10):1267-71.

45. Villani M, Dentali F, Colaizzo D, Tiscia GL, Vergura P, Petruccelli T, et al. Pregnancy-related venous thrombosis: comparison between spontaneous and ART conception in an Italian cohort. BMJ Open. 2015;5(10):e008213.

46. Chan WS. The ‘ART’ of thrombosis: a review of arterial and venous thrombosis in assisted reproductive technology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;21(3):207-18.

47. Jenkins JM, Drakeley AJ, Mathur RS. The management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. In: Green-top guideline no. 5. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2006.

48. Treffers PE, Huidekoper BL, Weenink GH, Kloosterman GJ. Epidemiological observations of thromboembolic disease during pregnancy and in the puerperium, in 56,022 women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1983;21(4):327-31.

49. Larsen TB, Johnsen SP, Gislum M, Møller CA, Larsen H, Sørensen HT. ABO blood groups and risk of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the puerperium. A population-based, nested case-control study. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3(2):300-4.

50. Donnelly JC, D’Alton ME. Pulmonary embolus in pregnancy. Semin Perinatol. 2013;37(4):225-33.

51. Lee MY, Kim MY, Han JY, Park JB, Lee KS, Ryu HM. Pregnancy-associated pulmonary embolism during the peripartum period: an 8-year experience at a single center. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2014;57(4):260-5.




Author contribution statement: LS and EC wrote the manuscript;
LS and CS performed the bibliographic research; PS critically reviewed the manuscript. All Authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement:
the Authors declare no conflicts of interest.




Correspondence to:

Luca Spiezia, MD

Department of Medicine DIMED

Thrombotic and Hemorrhagic Diseases and Coagulation
Diseases Units

Veneto Region Hemophilia and Thrombophilia Center

University of Padua Medical School

Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy

Tel. +39 049 8212663, Fax +39 049 8212651

e-mail: luca.spiezia




Il Pensiero Scientifico Editore
Riproduzione e diritti riservati  |   ISSN online: 2612-3487