Area Abbonati
LoginPassword
DOI 10.1723/3035.30355 Scarica il PDF (546,2 kb)
Ital J Gender-Specific Med 2018;4(3):114-122



Phenotypic expressions of Alzheimer’s disease:
a gender perspective

Nicoletta Smirne1, Patrizia Notaro1,2, Desirèe Addesi1, Valentina Laganà1, Natalia Altomari1,2, Giusy Torchia1, Rosanna Colao1, Chiara Cupidi1, Francesca Frangipane1, Gianfranco Puccio1, Sabrina Anna Maria Curcio1, Maria Mirabelli1, Raffaele Maletta1, Maria Anfossi1, Livia Bernardi1, Maria Elena Conidi1, Maura Gallo1, Franca Vasso1, Ornella De Vito1, Gabriella Muraca1, Raffaele Di Lorenzo1, Giuseppe Passarino2, Amalia Cecilia Bruni1

1. Centro Regionale di Neurogenetica, ASP CZ, Lamezia Terme, Italy;

2. Dipartimento di Biologia, Ecologia e Scienze della Terra, Università della Calabria, Arcavacata di Rende (CS).

Received 27 June 2018; accepted 17 October 2018.

Summary. Introduction. Dementia is one of the main diseases linked to aging and leading to disability. The gender perspective of this disease has not been studied in a complete and dedicated way and this constitutes a great limitation because dementia, like other diseases, appears to have a gender-related expression. The aim of this research is to contribute to the study of gender differences in a large cohort of patients affected by Alzheimer’s disease. Methods and patients. The study population included the clinical records of 1925 patients with Alzheimer’s disease, diagnosed according to NINCDS-ADRDA criteria and to NIA-AA, from the e-database of the Neurogenetic Regional Centre (NRC) of Lamezia Terme (Southern Italy). The mean age of the sample was 71.5 ± 8.9 years and follow-up was an average of 4 years. The variables included in the analysis and differentiated for gender were the prevalence and the onset of the disease, the time elapsed between the onset and the first consultation, duration of follow-up, duration of the disease, education, cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors. A check list of symptoms and signs was compiled from the cognitive and behavioral history and categorized in 12 clusters. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS 20 (significance was given by p <0.05). Results. Women were more numerically represented in the sample (67.1%). There were no differences according to gender in the time elapsed between onset of symptoms and the first consultation, in the follow-up period and in the duration of disease. Women were more cognitively impaired at baseline (MMSE score 15.9 ± 5.9 vs 17 ± 6.5), had a lower level of education (5.6 years vs 6.51 years) and presented higher comorbidity and incidence of depression (p = 0.000) and anxiety (p = 0.002). Men displayed a more rapid decline at the end of the follow-up, losing 3.85 ± 4.66 points vs 2.93 ± 4.39 at MMSE; they showed a statistically significant prevalence in behavioral symptoms (p = 0.009), including irritability (p = 0.000) and agitation (p = 0.041), and some cognitive deficits, such as language impairments (p = 0.000), apraxia (p = 0.005), spatial disorientation (p = 0.006) and acalculia (p = 0.035). APOE results were not representative in terms of gender differences but confirmed a possible impact of the ε4 allele on cognitive decline. Discussion. Behind the classical memory impairment and temporal disorientation, that are present in about all men and woman, a different AD phenotype between the two genders emerges from this work. Our results revealed a poorly-educated female sample, with a worse cognitive impairment and mood disorders. Men showed a more rapid cognitive impairment and an aggressive behavioral picture. The identification of specific gender aspects, cognitive and behavioral, could be a valuable aid for a faster identification of Alzheimer’s disease and its better management.

Key words: Alzheimer’s disease, gender-specific medicine.

Espressioni fenotipiche della malattia di Alzheimer: una prospettiva di genere

Riassunto. Introduzione. La demenza è una delle principali patologie connesse all’invecchiamento e una delle maggiori cause di disabilità. Tuttavia, gli studi sulle differenze di genere non sono stati ancora sviluppati in maniera completa sebbene esistano indicazioni di quadri clinici diversamente espressi nei due sessi. Lo scopo di questo lavoro è stato quello di analizzare le differenze di genere in un’ampia coorte di pazienti affetti da malattia di Alzheimer. Metodi e pazienti. Il campione è costituito da 1925 pazienti affetti da malattia di Alzheimer (diagnosticata secondo i criteri NINCDS-ADRDA e NIA-AA) e seguiti presso il Centro Regionale di Neurogenetica di Lamezia Terme (Calabria, Sud Italia). L’età media è di 71,5 ± 8,9 anni ed il follow-up medio è di 4 anni. Le variabili considerate sono state: prevalenza ed esordio della malattia, tempo intercorso tra esordio e prima visita, durata del follow-up e della malattia, scolarità, fattori di rischio cardiovascolari e metabolici oltre a un elenco di segni e sintomi che sono stati estratti dall’anamnesi cognitiva e comportamentale dei pazienti e suddivisi in 12 cluster. L’analisi statistica è stata effettuata mediante SPSS 20 (p <0,05). Risultati. Il sesso femminile è maggiormente rappresentato nel campione (67,1%). Non sono risultate differenze significative nel tempo intercorso tra l’esordio della malattia e la prima visita, nella durata del follow-up e nella durata della malattia. Le donne presentano una maggiore compromissione cognitiva sia alla valutazione basale che al termine del follow-up (MMSE 15,9 ± 5,9 vs 17 ± 6,5 nei maschi, che presentano un declino cognitivo più rapido alla fine del periodo di valutazione: MMSE 3,85 ± 4,66 vs 2,93 ± 4,39 nelle donne). Le donne della popolazione da noi studiata presentano una scolarità più bassa (5,6 anni vs 6,51), un maggiore indice di comorbilità e una più alta prevalenza di ansia (p = 0,002) e depressione (p = 0,000). Gli uomini si presentano con una prevalenza statisticamente più elevata di disturbi comportamentali, tra cui irritabilità (p = 0,000) e agitazione (p = 0,041), e diversi disturbi cognitivi, tra cui deficit di linguaggio (p = 0,000), aprassia (p = 0,005), disorientamento spaziale (p = 0,006) e acalculia (p = 0,035). I risultati relativi alla distribuzione dell’allele ε4 dell’APOE non mostrano differenze significative in relazione al genere, sebbene confermino un possibile impatto di questo allele sul declino cognitivo. Discussione. Oltre al classico pattern alzheimeriano caratterizzato dal disturbo di memoria e dal disorientamento temporale, presente in quasi tutto il campione senza differenza di genere, le donne si presentano con una più bassa scolarità e un più grave declino cognitivo, e con la maggiore prevalenza di disturbi del tono dell’umore. Diversamente, gli uomini mostrano un più rapido declino cognitivo e un quadro comportamentale più aggressivo. L’identificazione di specifici aspetti di genere potrebbe essere un valido aiuto per un’identificazione più precoce della malattia di Alzheimer e una sua migliore gestione.

Parole chiave: malattia di Alzheimer, medicina genere-specifica.

Introduction

Populations are globally getting older and women will live longer than men but this means more years spent in ill health. Men have a shorter life expectancy than women, but they enjoy a greater proportion of their lives in good health1. Dementia is one of the major diseases linked to aging that lead to disability and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is, almost globally, the most prevalent one of these. In recent years, AD detection and its early diagnosis have improved with NIA-AA criteria2, though unfortunately, this has not yet corresponded to a great (and expected) advancement in pharmacological treatments. It is well known that the gender perspective has not properly enriched the dementia research world: data is inconsistent, frequently inferred from other research projects having other aims and analyzing different contexts and different set populations, not specifically produced and dedicated. This is a great limitation, important to overcome, because the different types of dementia, like other diseases, also seem to show a gender-related expression. The Italian epidemiological study on Aging (ILSA) conducted by CNR reported a greater prevalence of AD in women and vascular dementia in males3; Lewy body disease is greatly expressed in cortical brain4 of males and the same gender trend has been signaled for Parkinson disease (PD) dementia5.

A recent revision work6, reconfirms that AD is preferentially expressed in women, while Parkinson’s disease, Lewy body dementia and vascular dementia are more frequent in males.

The aim of this work is to contribute to this topic, analyzing gender differences in a large cohort of patients affected by Alzheimer’s disease, by evaluating qualitative and quantitative clinical features such as onset, progression, phenotypic picture, duration and associated risk factors.

Patients and methods

The dataset included 1925 patients diagnosed by AD and followed at the Neurogenetic Regional Centre (NRC) in Lamezia Terme (ASP CZ) from 1996 to 2016.

Diagnosis was performed according to NINCDS-ADRDA criteria7 and to the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association workgroup2. The mean age of the whole sample was 71.5 ± 8.9 years. Follow-up was mean 4 years. Duration of the disease was about 9 years. Most of the patients came from southern Italy. Data was retrospectively extracted from corresponding clinical records.

For each patient we calculated: onset of the disease (derived from the clinical history and reported by informant) defined as the time when the patient presented with evident cognitive and/or behavioural disorders; familial recurrence (at least one first-degree relative affected); time elapsed between the onset and the first visit; follow-up duration. Education (low ≤5 years, high >5 years) was analyzed continuously and by levels. Cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, heart diseases, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes), dysthyroidism and psychiatric disturbances were considered positive when reported in the patient’s medical history.

APOEε4+ genotype and allelic frequency was calculated from a sample of 912 patients.

Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)8; Activities of Daily Living (ADL)9 and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)10, Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS)11 and Hachinski12 were performed on all patients.

A checklist encompassing cognitive and behavioral symptoms and signs collected through medical history or ascertained by the medical team was then implemented and subdivided into twelve clusters as shown in Table 1.




Statistical analysis

Student T-test was used to compare the mean value of the answers to the tests and the χ2 to evaluate the differences among risk factors and clinical signs between men and women. All analyses were performed on the whole group and differentiated by gender. To understand whether the results are stable over time, the whole period under examination was divided into two decades (1996-2005 and 2006-2016). Statistical significance was given by p <0.05. All analyses were performed by SPSS 21 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Women were 67.1% of the total AD and were much more copiously represented in the late onset form whereas males were significantly prevalent in the early onset group (p = 0.008) (Table 2). No differences in familial recurrence emerged in relation to gender.

Elapsing time between the onset of the disease and the first visit (Elapsing Time Onset-Visit) was about 4 years without gender difference (men 3.7 ± 3.3 years, women 3.7 ± 3.1 years) over the whole period (Table 2). However, patients assessed between 2006 and 2016 had a statistically significant lower Elapsing Time Onset-Visit than those assessed between 1996 and 2005 (p = 0.001) (Table 3).

The mean follow-up calculated on a smaller sample (431 men and 944 women) did not reveal significant differences: both groups were followed up for the same time with an average follow-up of about 4 years (men 3.3 ± 2.7 years, women 3.5 ± 2.9 years) (Table 2).

Education: the men had received more education than women (6.5 ± 4.5 yrs and 5.1 ± 4.1 yrs respectively, p = 0.000). A lower education level was more prevalent in late onset AD female group (p = 0.000) (Table 2) (Figure 1).

At the first evaluation of cognitive impairment the MMSE score was 16.3 ± 6.2 and women appeared more compromised than men (MMSE 15.9 ± 5.9 vs 17 ± 6.5 women and men respectively; p = 0.001) (Table 2). Considering the whole sample, we found a significant difference in the MMSE score of patients who were present in the first period (1996-2005) and those who took part in the second period (2006-2016), respectively 14.0 ± 7.0 and 16.9 ± 5.7 (p = 0.000) (Table 3).

Alcohol abuse was prevalent in men (p = 0.000) while women presented a larger number of risk factors: dystyroidism (p = 0.000), cholesterol (p = 0.001), hypertension (p = 0.000) and psychiatric disturbances (depression) (p = 0.000) (Table 4). No differences related to sex were observed according to APOEε4+.

From the evaluation of cognitive-behavioral clusters it emerges that men registered a significant prevalence in language impairment [46.6%, p = 0.000, specifically with sensory aphasia (p = 0.028), semantic paraphasias (p = 0.01) and word aphasia (p = 0.005)]; apraxia (37.5%, p = 0.035); spatial orientation deficit (62.7%, p = 0.006); agraphia and calculation problems (18.2%, p = 0.009) (Table 5) completed the picture.

In addition, behavioral disorders were more prevalent in men (62.6%, p = 0.012) and specifically bulimia (p = 0.000), disinhibition (p = 0.01), mental rigidity (p = 0.041), alteration of sexual behavior (p = 0.000), aggression (p = 0.000), irritability (p = 0.000) and agitation (p = 0.041), while women presented with mood disorder domain (41.9%, p = 0.000) and specifically depression (p = 0.000). These results are reported in Table 5, and shown in Figure 2.










Discussion

The main aim of this study was to analyze gender differences in a numerically relevant group of patients affected by AD diagnosed from 1996 to 2016 and followed at the RNC in southern Italy.

This was an observational study and data was retrospectively derived from clinical records, recorded by the same medical team using the same methods of observation and data collation.

Although the literature concerning gender differences in dementia is still scarce in the identification of specific features, the picture emerging from this work highlights significant differences.

Women with late onset AD represented about 2/3 of the whole group; this data is in agreement with previous data that reported a higher risk of developing dementia in women of a specific age13-14.

We did not find differences in familial recurrence in the elapsing time between onset and the first consultation, follow-up, duration of the disease, ADL, IADL, APOEε4+.

In addition, follow-up (about 4 years) did not highlight substantial gender differences, suggesting that access to care was similar for both genders15. However, for both genders, the central element that emerges is the long time lapse (4 years) between the appearance of early symptoms and the first consultation. This time lapse diverges radically from national and European data, which varies between 36 and 63 weeks16. The critical point is the geographical and cultural setting of our sample. Belonging to a region of southern Italy where being affected by AD still represents a stigma, it reveals a culture of fear and marginalization of the disease that would require enormous effort to combat.

The positive trend in the elapsing time between onset of the disease and the first examination should however be stressed: it seems that in the latter period (2006-2016) people submitted to clinical observation about 6/8 months earlier in comparison with the previous decade. This data is probably consistent with the difference in MMSE score (14.0 ± 7.5 vs 16.9 ± 5.7).

The delay in diagnosis was related to the low cultural level (76.5% <5 years in our late onset patients) and women were less educated than men (20.4% completely illiterate and only 50.5% had at least 5 years of schooling). Correlation between low education level and AD confirms the higher probability of women of being exposed to the risk of dementia, as already reported17. On this subject, an epidemiological study on dementia in Europe and its impact over the last 20 years highlighted a reduction in the incidence of the disease due to the growing education level18.

The strong correlation between dementia and cardio-cerebro-vascular factors (hypertension, diabetes and obesity19-21) is a well-known phenomenon, prevalent in women as well as in our sample where women are more affected by vascular and metabolic diseases. Only alcohol abuse is prevalent among male patients (7.4%). Other major differences related to the speed and degree of cognitive deterioration.

Women were more impaired at the first visit, although the duration of the disease was the same in male patients (15.9 ± 5.9 vs 17 ± 6.5). Cognitive impairment was moderate-severe with about 1 point less at MMSE than men as already evidenced by other authors22 and suggesting a faster decline of women at the early stages of the disease. Four years from the onset, the decline was uniform and there were no gender differences. Although this trend complies with previous studies in the literature23, the data lends itself to many interpretations that enable us to hypothesize new characterizing scenarios concerning the onset.

Signs of an ongoing brain disease tend to be recognized later in women, and are therefore not exactly dated, in a context where social and cultural dynamics reduce the perception of the disease, both by patient and family. The woman is probably able to disguise the progression of a disease such as Alzheimer’s disease, because she continues to perform everyday tasks rather like an automated mechanism with the functions deeply rooted in her being. Making the bed, laying the table, cooking and taking care of family members, are almost atavistic tasks (in our country) learned during childhood and performed during the span of a lifetime. Signs of the disease, in women, are visible only when the decline is at a more advanced stage and “motoric rituals”, previously carried out without any hitch, become very difficult due to apraxia or dysexecutive impairment. In contrast, men have greater exposure to social life and practical tasks. These factors make the signs of the disease visible at an earlier stage compared to women. Moreover, men are generally responsible for the economic administration of family life: the early impairment in calculation (p = 0.009) facilitates an earlier diagnosis.

Another characteristic blurring identification of the AD in women is the maintenance of good verbal fluency, while 50% of males exhibit speech problems. This is in agreement with literature data24 and reinforces the hypothesis that highly-educated patients greatly deteriorate in language functions25. It turns out indeed, that the best preservation of language functions in women become a problem leading to a delay in diagnosis26.

The impressive behavioural and psychiatric symptoms (BPSD) exhibited by males (disinhibition, aggressiveness, abnormal sexual behavior, bulimia, mental rigidity and irritability), already reported in the literature27 led to an easier identification of the AD, while women’s depression is “silent” and under recognized and this probably contributes to the late identification of the disease28.

Thus, we can conclude that the AD phenotype is gender-related with some discrete characteristics: more mood disorders in women with a worse cognitive impairment, and a more rapid progression in men, accompanied by an aggressive behavioral disorder.

Why and on what basis do these differences occur?

Some possible fields such as different connexions, different hormonal background, different genetics (or different expression of genes), different load of risk factors, can be investigated for explanations.

Gender differences in behavioral and cognitive functioning are widely established in the current scientific literature. Biological and genetic differences in association with environment and culture have resulted in the cognitive and behavioral differences between men and women. The different hormonal background, among the biological factors, may play a pivotal role in mediating these differences in different brain connections as well. The brain must be considered as a large-scale network of interconnected nodes within the human connectome. Small world network models could be relevant for understanding the emergence of complex behaviors and the resilience of brain systems to pathological attack by diseases or aberrant development29. Gender differences in the brain connectome may provide an important foundation for delineating the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying sex differences in neuropsychiatric disorders. A study based on 949 youths using the diffusion-based structural connectome of the brain, established that male brains are optimized for intra-hemispheric communication and facilitate connectivity between perception and coordinated action whereas female brains, optimizing interhemispheric communication, facilitate communication between analytical and intuitive processing modes30. This happens in the physiological domain. When considering the AD related risk, Mosconi31, studying Amyloid Positron emission Tomography (PET) and Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET, found a progressively increasing risk of AD in women undergoing menopausal changes. This suggests that endocrine aging accelerates chronologic aging in the female brain by several years, if not decades, prior to emergence of possible clinical symptoms of AD.

Gene expression profiles revealed substantial differences in the trajectory of aging changes between female and male brains. In female brains, 44.2% of genes change from 6 months to 9 months and 2/3 showed downregulation. In contrast, in male brains, this happens only in 5.4% of genes over the same period. This means that female and male brains follow profoundly different trajectories with age: the brains of women undergo age-related changes much earlier than male brains; these precocious changes in female brains signal the onset of a hypometabolic phenotype, at risk for AD. These findings provide a mechanistic rationale for female susceptibility to AD and suggest a potential window of opportunity for AD prevention and risk reduction in women32. Also sex-specific differences in neuro-mediators have been identified in male and female brains: they are neurochemically distinct in relation to dopaminergic, serotonergic, and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) systems with serotonin that sexually differentiate at multiple levels33.

Conclusions

Behind the classic memory impairment and temporal disorientation, present in virtually all men and woman, a different AD phenotype between the two genders emerges from this work. These differences could originate from the profound cerebral differences (genetic, hormonal and in brain connections) that exist between the two sexes. More research work, however, is needed because results are still at the initial stage. All types of dementia have to be studied in this new light and verified in different contexts. Gender-specific treatment and care might assume a higher degree of importance.




References

1. Istat: Anno 2015. Anziani: le condizioni di salute in Italia e nell’Unione Europea. Statistiche, Report 26/9/2017. Available at: https://www.istat.it/it/files//2017/09/Condizioni_Salute_anziani_anno_2015.pdf

2. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease : recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 2011; 7(3):263-9.

3. Di Carlo A, Baldereschi M, Amaducci L, et al. Incidence of dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, and vascular dementia in Italy. The ILSA Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50(1): 41-8.

4. Nelson PT, Schmitt FA, Jicha GA, et al. Association between male gender and cortical Lewy body pathology in large autopsy series. J Neurol 2010; 257(11): 1875-81.

5. Gillies GE, Pienaar IS, Vohra S, et al. Sex differences in Parkinson disease. Front Neuroendocrinol 2014; 35: 370-84.

6. Podcasy JL, Epperson CN. Considering sex and gender in Alzheimer disease and other dementias. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2016; 18(4): 437-46.

7. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan E M. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology 1984; 34(7): 939.

8. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh P R, Fanjiang G. Mini-mental state examination user’s guide. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 2001.

9. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged: the index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963; 185(12): 914-9.

10. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Nursing Research 1970; 19(3): 278.

11. Miller MD, Paradis CF, Houck PR, et al. Rating chronic medical illness burden in geropsychiatric practice and research: application of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale. Psychiatry Res 1992; 41(3): 237-48.

12. Hachinski VC, Iliff LD, Zilhka E, at al. Cerebral blood flow in dementia. Arch Neurol 1975; 32(9): 632-7.

13. Alzheimer’s Association. 2014 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2014; 10(2): e47-e92.

14. Mielke MM, Vemuri P, Rocca WA. Clinical epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease: assessing sex and gender differences. Clin Epidemiol 2014; 6: 37-48.

15. Ministero della Salute. Il genere come determinante di salute. Lo sviluppo della medicina di genere per garantire equità e appropriatezza della cura. Quaderni del Ministero della Salute, n. 26, aprile 2016

16. Jones RW, Mackell J, Berthet K, Knox S. Assessing attitudes and behaviours surrounding Alzheimer’s disease in Europe: key findings of the Important Perspectives on Alzheimer’s Care and Treatment (IMPACT) survey. J Nutr Health Aging 2010; 14(7): 525-30.

17. Rocca WA, Mielke MM, Vemuri P, Miller VM. Sex and gender differences in the causes of dementia: A narrative review. Maturitas 2014; 79(2): 196-201.

18. Wu YT, Fratiglioni L, Matthews FE, et al. Dementia in western Europe: epidemiological evidence and implications for policy making. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15(1): 116-24.

19. Wiesmann M, Roelofs M, van der Lugt R, Heerschap A, Kiliaan AJ, Claassen JA. Angiotensin II, hypertension, and angiotensin II receptor antagonism: Roles in the behavioural and brain pathology of a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2017; 37(7): 2396-413.

20. Ettcheto M, Petrov D, Pedrós I, et al. Hypercholesterolemia and neurodegeneration. Comparison of hippocampal phenotypes in LDLr knockout and APPswe/PS1dE9 mice. Exp Gerontol 2015; 65, 69-78.

21. Barnes DE, Yaffe K. The projected effect of risk factor reduction on Alzheimer’s disease prevalence. Lancet Neurol 2011; 10(9): 819-28.

22. Li R, Singh M. Sex differences in cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Front Neuroendocrinol 2014; 35(3): 385-403.

23. Barnes LL, Wilson RS, Schneider JA, Bienias JL, Evans DA, Bennett DA. Gender, cognitive decline, and risk of AD in older persons. Neurology 2003; 60(11): 1777-81.

24. Sundermann EE, Maki PM, Rubin LH, Lipton RB, Landau S, Biegon A; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Female advantage in verbal memory. Evidence of sex-specific cognitive reserve. Neurology 2016; 87(18): 1916-24.

25. Laws KR, Duncan A, Gale TM. “Normal’ semantic–phonemic uency discrepancy in Alzheimer’s disease? A meta-analytic study. Cortex 2010; 46: 595-601.

26. Sundermann EE, Biegon A, Rubin LH, Lipton RB, Landau S, Maki PM. Does the female advantage in verbal memory contribute to underestimating Alzheimer’s disease pathology in women versus men? J Alzheimers Dis 2017; 56(3): 947-57.

27. Ott BR, Tate CA, Gordon NM, Heindel WC. Gender differences in the behavioral manifestations of Alzheimer’s disease. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996; 44(5): 583-7.

28. Tsuno N, Homma A. What is the association between depression and Alzheimer’s disease? Expert Rev Neurother 2009; 9(11): 1667-76.

29. Bassett DS, Bullmore ED. Small-world brain networks. Neuroscientist 2006; 12: 512-23.

30. Ingalhalikar M, Smith A, Parker D, et al. Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014; 111: 823-8.

31. Mosconi L, Berti V, Quinn C, et al. Sex differences in Alzheimer risk: Brain imaging of endocrine vs chronologic aging. Neurology 2017; 89: 1382-90.

32. Zhao L, Mao Z, Woody SK, et al. Sex differences in metabolic aging of the brain: insights into female susceptibility to Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 2016; 42: 69-79.

33. Cosgrove KP, Mazure CM, Staley JK. Evolving knowledge of sex differences in brain structure, function, and chemistry. Biol Psychiatry 2007; 62: 847-55.

Conflict of interest statement: the Authors declare no financial disclosures related to the content of this article.

Correspondence to:

Amalia Cecilia Bruni

Centro Regionale di Neurogenetica

Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale Catanzaro

Viale A Perugini

88046 Lamezia Terme (CZ), Italy

email amaliaceciliabruni@gmail.com

Il Pensiero Scientifico Editore
Riproduzione e diritti riservati  |   ISSN online: 2612-3487